Katahdin: A Native word meaning, roughly, biggest mountain; a place to be dreamed of; a destination to be earned.

         Mount Katahdin: At 5,269 feet it’s a middling peak by world standards. But it’s the highest by far in these parts, and a Maine icon. Simply getting a reservation to climb it is something of a triumph.

         As the centerpiece of Baxter State Park, Katahdin is ascended by hundreds of hikers each summer, all of whom must negotiate the park’s reservation system before setting foot on any of the steep, rocky, sometimes manageable, sometimes heartbreaking trails—every one of which passes through a piece of the wildest country in the East. Two years ago I tried and failed to get a camping and hiking reservation. Last year I snagged one but had to cancel when my hiking partner (Jeff) injured himself while sailing. And so a few weeks ago when we finally shouldered our backpacks and hit the trail under the bluest of skies, our spirits were soaring.

         Why was I so set on climbing the mountain? A fair question. It was partly the lure of the challenge and partly the rite of passage: Most everyone I know who’s lived in Maine for a while has made it to the top. But there was another reason.

Three years ago, on our second visit to Baxter State Park, we had just come through the southern entrance when we saw a hitchhiker by the road. There were no other cars around. How could we not stop?

He jumped in the backseat and told us he’d just been come down from the mountaintop. He’d hiked up the west side and down the east; now he needed a ride back to his car. He couldn’t stop smiling. He had the expression of someone floating ecstatically through the world, in love with life. I decided then and there that I’d someday climb the mountain. I wanted to be where he’d been, and see what he’d seen. I wanted that aura of happiness and achievement.

         Now Jeff and I were hiking the trail to the Chimney Pond campground with food and gear for a three-night stay in a mountain cirque a mere two miles from Katahdin’s peak. We reveled in the cool, clear air, the moist feel of the forest around us.  Sure, our backpacks were a little too heavy. But the campground was only 3.3 miles from the parking lot where we’d left the car. We had no doubt we could manage the climb.

        I had backpacked in my twenties and thirties but not since. I knew better than to go out with a too-heavy pack. That morning, after loading up everything and hoisting my pack, I began tossing stuff. Not needed—extra flashlight; not needed—bird book. Camp shoes. Two pairs of binoculars. (Jeff argued that we didn’t need any.) Why hadn’t we thought this through a little more thoroughly? (I thought we had.) There was nothing for it now but to keep putting one foot in front of the other, ascending alongside fast-flowing Roaring Brook and into steeper country, where the trail was lined and strewn with boulders. Jeff’s pace slowed. I began resting often with my pack propped on a rock. Hours passed. Three-point-three miles: Hadn’t we already come that far, and more? I studied the forest around us, the spruces and firs and the occasional large maples and birches. I rejoiced when the trees grew shorter and the view opened to alpine lakes. A few steps later we both nearly cried when we reached a sign informing us that we still had a mile to go.

We made it, of course, and the pain was worth what we found.

Chimney Pond is a small jewel set in deep forest and encircled by three peaks. A smooth joining of mountainsides. We stood on the shore, marveling. To the south, Pamola Mountain curled into the long form of Katahdin, which melded into Hamlin Ridge. In many places the walls were streaked with beautiful vermilion stone. Watching the colors fade as the sun dipped below the towering ridges, I wanted to be nowhere else on Earth.

That night the stars were the brightest I’d seen in the East.

         Our plan had been to continue on to Katahdin’s peak the following day. We woke knowing this was a bad idea. We were too sore, and too depleted.

Luckily we were not too worn out to take short hikes. We explored the first section of the difficult Cathedral Trail, which began with a steep but manageable climb. We hiked the rising trail through damp forest, passing over a rushing stream we could hear but barely see, buried as it was beneath piled rocks.

We heard the buzz of a mountain chickadee. In full sun now, we hoisted ourselves around and over pale boulders taller than we were. They had been rolled together like marbles by glacial ice.  At the base of the first cathedral, the point at which serious rock climbing would have begun, we sat down and reveled in being here, here, on the side, if not the peak, of Katahdin.

Hiking back to camp, Jeff found a pile of spruce cone scales where an animal, perhaps a squirrel, had left them piled in a tidy circle. Bright mauve on their insides, they were as beautiful as bits of amethyst.

All the while I knew that this sunny day of relaxation might cost us our chance to reach the summit. The next day’s forecast was for clouds and fog and spitting rain. Even if we managed to finish the climb in such conditions, we probably wouldn’t be able to see past the end of our hiking poles.

We hiked toward Pamola Caves, moving slowly along, sometimes sitting still and just looking, examining small things we would have missed on a more purposeful, destination-driven hike: the lichens on the rocks. The small shrubs pushing stubbornly from cracks between boulders. I told myself it was enough to be on Katahdin’s flank, that the chance to pause and revel in the beauty of this country was a gift we wouldn’t have received if we’d been hellbent on getting to the summit.  

Back in camp, I sat on the bench in front of our lean-to, looking up for a long time. Three big white birches, older and grander than most I’d seen, enclosed our campsite. Their branches waved in a spunky southern breeze (a sign, I knew, of weather possibly changing). Just beyond them, barely visible, was a steep, treeless, vermillion-streaked cliff: the top third of Katahdin.

Jeff asked me if I could feel the spirits of the place—meaning the life pulsing through the trees and rocks and bushes around us. An interesting question, and one on most days that I might have answered yes. I realized that what I felt here was more expansive, a wholeness born of the entire landscape.  I hoped it would be enough, should we be stranded in camp by weather on our last day.

The weather forecast did not improve. As darkness gathered I crawled into my sleeping bag—content, though I knew this would probably be as far up the mountain as we would go.  What a gift, to be here, here, if not on the summit. I had a suspicion that I would be glowing after we made our way back to civilization. I slept deeply and well.

As often happens, the weather forecast was utterly wrong. We woke, astounded, to bright sun. Instead of packing up and packing out, after several hours of hard, beautiful, exhilarating, excruciating hiking and climbing, at last we reached the top of Katahdin.

The view from the top—and a sign of the wind’s srength

Subscribe to my blog, published eight times a year, at the (overly long) link below:

https://jandeblieu.us8.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=7d9f0ae8783a412745be0f881&id=b0ca11c492

Posted
AuthorJan DeBlieu

A tidal surge at Greenhead Lobsters in Stonington, Maine, in January. Click here for a video of the tide’s quick rise. Boston Globe image, provided by Greenhead Lobsters

The storms—all three of them— drifted along what was at first a novel route, then a frighteningly familiar one. An unusual wave in the jet stream helped spin them up and toss them off like meteorological cannon fire. One by one they passed over Quebec and moved off the coast. Their slow drift, coupled with the air plunging toward their cores, generated winds more long-lasting and powerful than any seen along the Maine coast for decades: southeasterlies of up to 70 miles an hour, with a few gusts to 90.

           The damage was among the worst ever suffered on the Maine coast. Immediately afterwards, some people swore they’d rebuild the wharves and docks and seafood packing houses they’d lost. But it’s becoming clear that this winter’s trio of tempests may have forever changed fishing communities here.

            When the first storm arrived on December 18th, Mainers everywhere felt its power. Ferocious winds left hundreds of thousands of households without electricity. Heavy rains pushed inland as far as Farmington (near Sugarloaf Mountain), where massive flooding shut down the entire city.

All that water swiftly ran for the sea. In the town of Hallowell, on the Kennebec River, waterfront businesses were left with two feet of tide in their basements. In downtown Brunswick, the Androscoggin River rose with such force that highway officials feared it would swamp the bridge crossing it. Flood water poured over the dam there and roiled its way downstream, roaring so loudly I could barely hear the words of a woman standing next to me. The dam stands about 18 feet. On that day, the overburdened river lapped nearly halfway up its height.

The second storm blew in three-and-a-half weeks later, its power centered over the coast. The third system followed three days later, in the same track. December 18th, January 10th, and January 13th:  “To get one of these storms would have been more than enough,” Maine state climatologist Sean Birkel said in an online presentation. Three in a row, in less than a month, was beyond belief. It didn’t help that the fiercest portion of the January 13th storm  arrived with an astronomically high tide—up to 14.7 feet, a state record.

            Every sea town or headland with any eastern exposure suffered significant damage. The beaches of Wells. The waterfronts in Portland. Harpswell, Phippsburg , Bristol, Port Clyde, Rockland, Rockport, Camden, Stonington, and on up the coast. Massive ocean waves even topped Pemaquid Point, with its famous lighthouse set high on a rocky point. The front wall of the brick building that holds the sea bell there was beaten to pieces by surf.

Maine’s fishing communities were home to countless docks and wharves that jutted into ocean coves, many with seafood packing houses atop them. Waves conjured by the two January storms damaged or destroyed many of them. The direction of the winds didn’t help. “Normally we have northeasters,” said Ben Martens, executive director of the nonprofit Maine Coast Fishermen’s Association. “We’ve built our infrastructure to handle northeasters, and we got waves coming from a direction that was completely unexpected. And then three days later, it happened again—but worse. Nobody was prepared for the scale of it.”

Lobster traps, neatly stacked on docks for the winter, were rolled and thrown by waves. Those that could be recovered were filled with leaves and seaweed. “The tides were two feet higher than the NOAA forecast,” Martens said. “In the middle of the (January 13th) storm, guys were wading through tide to unplug cords from electrical boxes that they had thought were okay”—high enough to be safe from flooding.

Estimates are that between 50 and 60 percent of the state’s working waterfronts were damaged or completely destroyed.

            From my years of living on Hurricane Alley on the North Carolina Outer Banks, I know what the residents of those battered communities must now face. Photographs and videos of flooding never completely capture the damage: the filth, the smell, the mold, the scale of the ruin.

How can these communities possibly recover from such a blow in the three short months before peak season begins?

When I asked Martens that question, he became somber.  “Honestly, we’re making it up as we go along,” he said. The state’s fishing fleet doesn’t have the knowledge or response team to swing right into rebuilding the damaged structures, in part because of the permits needed. “What’s legal? What’s not legal? What are the steps we need to go through?”

The question now, he said, is whether many of the wooden wharves and fish houses so iconic along the Maine coast will be built back at all.

  There are so many factors that comprise the landscapes we love. For me one of those is the mess of boats and docks along the coast, as well as the people who work the waters. Fishing towns have grit and vibrance; they’re a stellar example of communities that exist in spite of, not because of modern culture. They’re also among the places most threatened by climate change.

The islands of the North Carolina Outer Banks, my home for three decades, don’t have nearly Maine’s tidal amplitude: 8-plus feet on the coast near the New Hampshire state line, building to 18 feet at Eastport, near the Canadian border. The ocean rising and falling 18 feet, twice a day: It’s a sight to behold, and not easy to work around.

Nor do the fish packing houses in Wanchese and Avon and Hatteras Village have wharves that extend into open waters like they do in Maine. Unloading and packing seafood on the Outer Banks is done on the more sheltered coastal sounds. In the aftermath of tropical storms and damaging northeasters, there’s plenty of money lost and nasty mucking out to do. Comparatively speaking, though, the logistics of putting things back in order are much simpler.

            Wharves in Maine typically reach far out into ocean coves and are set high enough to be out of the reach of tides. On the dropping-and-swelling ocean here, it’s tricky to unload crates and boxes of lobsters and the bait fish menhaden (called pogies here). Mechanical lifts are often used to bring filled crates up to the level of wharves.

            Think about the difficulty and expense of replacing all that, especially in these times: A lobsterman I spoke with said that last summer, six months before the storms, a family member had made some inquiries about replacing a single, simple wharf. He was told that because of labor shortages, the marine construction company was taking orders three years out.

Working waterfronts in Maine were already under tremendous pressure because of gentrification. During the pandemic, sales of second homes in Maine skyrocketed. The Island Institute, the Maine Coast Fishermen’s Association, and other nonprofit groups are nervously tracking the disappearance of commercial mooring fields and landing sites.

As I read the accounts of damage and the struggles to work out how to get a few facilities operable for peak lobster season, I think about how much the lives of fishermen and women differ from mine. Fishing is an identity, not just a job. In an online video, a retired lobsterman from Camden describes how he considers the ocean to be the same as his home. “People don’t understand the connection to us of that flat, broad expanse of water. . . . To us it’s just like this town, where we have this street, and that house . . . It’s the extension of our lives. We have a vision and image and perception of all that’s going on underwater.”

Each time a boat goes out, there’s no guarantee it will return, though they almost always do. There’s generally no hourly wage, so earnings can fluctuate wildly. There’s only the community and the culture you belong to, and the joy of being on the water.

That culture includes the infrastructure that waits on shore. It’s been deeply upsetting to residents in these communities to lose wharves and packing houses with long family histories—many of them built by relatives and friends now gone.

  There’s talk of the state and federal governments providing financial assistance, though it’s not clear how much or when it might arrive. It’s difficult to imagine that it will be sufficient to rebuild all that was lost. For now, says Sam Belknap of the Island Institute, the affected families aren’t counting on financial help. They don’t have time. Their focus is on doing everything they can to get back on the water for the season. That includes repairing structures that received minor damage and working out arrangements to share space with those whose docks and wharves and packing houses were spared.

“Fishermen are fixers,” Martens said. “They move move move. I’m always awed by the resilience of these guys and their families and communities.” Even so, he acknowledged, everyone’s feeling pretty beat up. “I think we just experienced a watershed moment in Maine.”

The three storms made it clear, Belknap says, that “climate change isn’t a ‘then’ problem. It’s a ‘now’ problem.”

Whichever wharves and docks and fish houses are replaced, recommendations are that they be built back higher—two or even four feet higher—than the original structures. Raising them, of course, carries additional expense. And should they again be made of wood, or of aluminum—or steel?

Martens noted that Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds can be made available to communities but not to individuals. So some towns may opt to build central docks and seafood packing facilities that can be shared. “I think it’s going to be a community by community decision,” he said.

Time will tell how many of the old iconic structures will be rebuilt. Suppose, Martens mused, you had a small dock behind your house where you could store some lobster traps and sometimes tie up your boat. It was old, maybe built by your grandfather. Those kinds of docks were everywhere. They were part of the coast’s well-worn but vibrant feel.

Many, if not most, are gone.

Posted
AuthorJan DeBlieu